Review of juvenile crime study source Essay

Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults is an essay by Laurence Steinberg, which expresses his views of if, when, and why young person offenders should be tried as enceintes. He compares the new-fashioned system to the grown system and point out hat the twain differ in their respective forms of decision making for treatment or discipline. In the recent past, society has redefined the judicial system for juveniles and is striving to realise more youth offenders trued and disciplined in with child(p) jail systems (632). harmonize to Steinberg, this represents a funda psychological challenge to the very premise that the juvenile plainlyterfly was founded on that adolescents and adults are different (632), and these forms of discipline are detrimental to the renewal of young barbarouss.The creator poses the question of how effective the judicial system is at determining when a child is to be tried as an adult and points out three very distinct characteristics of an adolescent ind ividual among the ages of 12 and 17. First, he states that at that place are dramatic changes in individuals physical, intellectual, emotional, and sociable capabilities between these ages (632). Secondly, he claims that between theses ages, individuals that have broken laws are gloss over open to many positive influences that may help them abandon their criminal instincts and tendencies (632).Lastly, he points out that youth offenders who are sentenced to harsh punishments as adolescents often do not recover from the mental harm it causes because it is an important developmental time and these experiences may have lasting and disadvantageous effects on their adult behaviors (632). In a second argument, Steinberg explains that he doesnt see that the age of a young defendant should be overlooked and, as seen earlier in the essay, uses three main points to illustrate this idea. First, he expresses that the legitimate system has a set of regulations and customs which differs from the individualistic and informal saddle horse of a juvenile court (633). For further explanation of the point, the author informs the reader that the differences between the adult and juvenile systems are significant in that the adult system utilizes only punishment in the form of jail time, probation, and grate (work), whereas the juvenile system uses more unconventional forms of punishment which places an emphasis on rehabilitation and cooperative programs to get adolescent offenders back on the correctly track (633).Secondly, he states that it is questionable whether a youthful offender has the competency to stand trial or not becauseof several factors including maturity and mental health status (633). In a tertiary and final point, the author informs the reader that because the adult court is based strictly on punishment, youth offenders have little to no chance for rehabilitation in the adult system (634). In his final argument, Steinberg suggests how he feels certain age groups should be dealt with in the legal systems. He concludes that children under the age of 12 should virtually definitely not be tried in an adult courtroom, that individuals of age(p) than 16 are not appreciable different from adults, and that the decision to turn out individuals between the ages of 12 and 16 should be based on a n individualized review and personalized assessment of circumstance, case matter, and a multitude of mental, social, and intellectual factors (635). In closing the author reminds us that there is no easy way to make the determination of whether youth offenders should be tried as adults, but that ignoring the offenders age wholly is like trying to ignore and elephant that has wandered in to the courtroom. You can do it, but most people will know that something smells foul (635).