Gun Control Essay -- Second Amendment The Right To Bear Arms

Gun Control in the United States newsworthiness is all around us and is readily available to everyone. There atomic number 18 many flaws in the system that hurts the authenticity of the news when you see it. The media is indirectly part of the policy-making system. Most news is either considered liberal or conservative by many.The media is often considered to be biased. The reason for this is because they do non act neutral on the things that they report on. They usually give their crown of view and tend to warp the information so its intimately digestible by the average person. This type of nugget feeding, can influence the shrewdness of some one who has no idea what is going on. The media tends to sensationalize the news by making it seem dramatic, and compelling. This hooks the viewer, and keeps them tuned in. The purpose of this is for ratings, and most importantly money. The media has conk out less professional, and their morality has gone down hill. The editors/gatekeep ers decide what information is send out for the public to see, and hear. This is another way that the news is shaped for our exhibit pleasure.The news media rejects the fact that they ar biased. They claim that they are the middle of the road, and are neutral on the stories that they cover. Publishers also claim that they are the watchdog for the political system, and they make sure that the system is free of any corruption, or wrongdoing. Th...

Conrads Intent In Heart Of Darkness :: essays research papers

Distilling the phantomIn analysis of Heart of repulsiveness, much is made of Conrads intentions in telling histale. People search for a moral lesson, a fixed social commentary, an absolution for theevil of the dark jungle. It isnt there, and thats non the point. In works of philosophy ( deal The Republic), or works of political scheme (likeSocialism Utopian and Scientific), or works of natural science (like The innovation ofSpecies), this sifting of important and clear ideas from the mess and confusion ofexperience is what writers like Plato, Darwin, or Engels ar doing. They experience theworld in all its mussy confusion, and then they attempt to airlift from the mess, bycareful selection, a body of ordering principles which other people can comprehend and catch up with commit of. In more figurative words, they are trying to shed the wake of intelligenceupon the lousiness of experience.As, primarily, students and teachers, we naturally look for the conveyance of suchide as in any material we encounter. We miss that books like Heart of Darkness arefundamentally different in intent and we continue searching for that lesson from which tomake a rational response to the story. Even literary professionals seem a great deal to fall into the error of neglecting ormisunderstanding the novelists purpose. Consider, for example, the criticism leveledagainst Heart of Darkness by Paul OPrey in his introduction to the Penguin edition. He writes It is an irony that the failures of Marlow and Kurtz are paralleled by acorresponding failure of Conrads technique--brilliant though it is--as the vastabstract darkness he imagines exceeds his capacity to analyze and dramatize it, andthe very unfitness to portray the storys central subject, the unimaginable, theimpenetrable (evil, emptiness, mystery or whatever) becomes a central theme. Mr. OPreys sentence is somewhat impenetrable itself, but his complaint is thatConrad wants to propose an abstract notion of darkness, bu t he doesnt manage toadequately make it or analyze it. He then goes on to quote, approvingly, another critic,throng Guetti, who complains that Marlow never gets below the surface, and is deniedthe final self-knowledge that Kurtz had. In other words, according to Mr. OPrey and Mr. Guetti, Conrad has somewayfailed in his attempt to delineate the horror that is Kurtzs final vision, failed to penetratethe darkness that Marlow evokes, failed to give a precise name and shape to the dark and sad human condition. Mr. OPrey and Mr. Guetti want, as all good academics want,clarity, definition, intellectual coherence, order, a well-stated and well-argued thesis they

Success Story: Subway Restaurants Essay -- Business Marketing Franchis

Success Story Subway Restaurants Subway Restaurants, the franchised ground machinate shops, has surpassed McDonalds as the largest restaurant chain in the country. The hearty Choice promoted chain surpassed the Big Mac of fast food by 148 locations. Subway exculpateded 904 new locations last year, to McDonalds 295 opened (www.Subway.com). The sandwich franchise began during the summer of 1965. Seventeen year old Fred DeLuca received a loan from a family friend for one thousand dollars, and opened the premier(prenominal) Subway in Bridgeport, Connecticut. The store name was not Subway hardly Petes tops(predicate) Submarines named after the family friend that gave Fred DeLuca the loan (www.entrepreneur.com). Petes Super Submarines was changed to the current name of Subway in 1974 (www.entrepreneur.com). Fred DeLuca wanted to expand and open more locations, he had a set goal of opening 32 shops with in ten-spot days. By 1974 DeLuca owned and operated sixtee n locations around Connecticut. DeLuca was sightly at the halfway point of his goal of 32 shops in ten years. Time was running short with just less than two years to achieve his targeted goal. DeLuca turned to franchising as an option to increase locations (www.Subway.com). A coadjutor of DeLuca was the first franchisee. Brian Dixon bought the Wallington, Connecticut location (www.Subway.com). In 2003 Subway is ranked count one in the franchise 500, they have held this title for three years in a row. Subway has also been ...

Julius Caesar Essay: Mark Antony as the Genius of Julius Caesar

Mark Antony as the Genius of Julius Caesar Mark Antony - the qat is a genius. He gives the most fibrous and senseal speech of all time conjured up by a man mind. He gets this powerful emotion from the pain of the loss of his friend, Julius Caesar. In Shakespe ares act upon about the ill-fated papistical ruler, a band of conspirators plot to eliminate Julius Caesar. They succeed in doing so, and Caesars outperform friend Antony is infuriated. However, he manages to keep his cool, until he is allowed to speak at Caesars funeral. Brutus, the attractor of the conspiracy, attempts to win the popularity and support of the group, and he does so with a speech full-of-the-moon of glittering generalities. His speech sounded good, but sincerely meant nothing. The people favor Brutus until Antony lots the patronage and delivers the cold hard facts, turning the fellowship of people into an angry stampede. The convincing techniques that were used by Antony serve uped him to gain the crowds support. If he did not use these techniques, Antony would scarcely be carried off the stage and propel into the mob. The techniques that he used (to get down his speech persuade the mob to help him) were the fact that he acknowledge the fence argument, his slowly rising emotional expression, and the use of a unreserved refrain that gets more and more grim each time around. Antony must(prenominal) acknowledge the opposing argument, because it helps him to show the crowd that he does not substantiate a selfish or one-tracked mind. The terrible Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it would be a grievous fault. (Act III, Scene ii, 79-81) Although the crowd knows it, Antony says that Brutus said that Caesar was ambitious. why? Antony restates what Brutus said to make a very p... ... Antony has just made a complete fool of Brutus. Again, precisely one small detail changed in the refrain to produce the jeering - the and sure. It is hard to be lieve that only ever-changing a few trivial words can cause that much(prenominal) of an impact on a speech. Through the use of these three telling techniques, Mark Antony succeeds in pleasant the support of the entire mob. By acknowledging the opposing argument, slowly letting his emotions take over, and using a simple refrain, Antony delivers the arrant(a) crowd-manipulating oration. Antony knows the psychology of persuasion, and he shows it when he gives the speech. The qualities of a persuasive speech, to speak of Antonys methods, are not obvious at all. They come slowly, and that is the way to get a crowd in your hands. working CitedShakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. New York Simon, 1975. Julius Caesar Essay Mark Antony as the Genius of Julius CaesarMark Antony as the Genius of Julius Caesar Mark Antony - the guy is a genius. He gives the most powerful and emotional speech ever conjured up by a human mind. He gets this powerful emotion from the pain of the loss of his friend, Julius Caesar. In Shakespeares play about the ill-fated Roman ruler, a band of conspirators plot to kill Julius Caesar. They succeed in doing so, and Caesars best friend Antony is infuriated. However, he manages to keep his cool, until he is allowed to speak at Caesars funeral. Brutus, the leader of the conspiracy, attempts to win the popularity and support of the crowd, and he does so with a speech full of glittering generalities. His speech sounded good, but really meant nothing. The people favor Brutus until Antony takes the stand and delivers the cold hard facts, turning the mob of people into an angry stampede. The persuasive techniques that were used by Antony helped him to gain the crowds support. If he did not use these techniques, Antony would simply be carried off the stage and thrown into the mob. The techniques that he used (to make his speech persuade the mob to help him) were the fact that he acknowledged the opposing argument, his slowly risin g emotional expression, and the use of a simple refrain that gets more and more sarcastic each time around. Antony must acknowledge the opposing argument, because it helps him to show the crowd that he does not have a selfish or one-tracked mind. The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it would be a grievous fault. (Act III, Scene ii, 79-81) Although the crowd knows it, Antony says that Brutus said that Caesar was ambitious. Why? Antony restates what Brutus said to make a very p... ... Antony has just made a complete fool of Brutus. Again, only one small detail changed in the refrain to produce the sarcasm - the and sure. It is hard to believe that only changing a few little words can cause that much of an impact on a speech. Through the use of these three persuasive techniques, Mark Antony succeeds in winning the support of the entire mob. By acknowledging the opposing argument, slowly letting his emotions take over, and using a simple refrain, Anton y delivers the perfect crowd-manipulating oration. Antony knows the psychology of persuasion, and he shows it when he gives the speech. The qualities of a persuasive speech, to speak of Antonys methods, are not obvious at all. They come slowly, and that is the way to get a crowd in your hands. Works CitedShakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. New York Simon, 1975.

Control In Lord Of The Flies :: essays papers

Control In Lord Of The Flies end-to-end William Goldings novel Lord of the Flies there is an ever-present conflict amidst two characters. Ralphs character combines common sense with a strong zest for genteel life. seafarer, however, is an antagonist with savage instincts, which he cannot control. Ralphs goals to achieve a team unit with organization atomic number 18 destroyed by Jacks actions and words that atomic number 18 openly displayed to the boys. The two leaders try to convince the boys that their way of option is correct. They continue this desire for control while turning down individually others decisions and ideas. The back and forth conflicts of opinion are what makes life chaos on the island. These conflicts are illustrated in two fashions the dialog between the boys, and the authors narration. Assuming that the boys are philistines, their language is therefore not very articulate. They are trying to shape up important and popular with the group. The boys have a feeling of wanting to belong, which is the undercoat of all philistines actions. The authors narration makes up for this. The cashier has a more practical view of what is happening on the island, and says to the reader what the boys language fails to do. The boys are draw away from a well-manneredized way of living. Comments made by Ralph and Jack show the boys that Jack is resorting to savagery. Ralph and Jack both agree in the parentage while they are reasoning in a civil manner. passim the novel the two leaders stray from one another because of differences in motivation. Jack told the boys Weve got to decide about being rescued (Golding 20). This statement illustrates Jacks civilized concern for the whole group. Jack seems to put the group before him. This self-giving concern soon dissolves as the internal beast prevails over the civil Jack. I ought to be chief because Im chapter chorister and I can sing C sharp (Golding, 21), displays Jacks own arrogance. However, the narrator has more insight into this force out struggle, This toy of voting was almost as pleasing as the conch (Golding 21). The narrator sees this act of voting through the boys eyes. The narrator implies the boys failure to understand the sizeableness of a leader. After the boys accept Ralph as chief, Ralph gives power over the choir boys to Jack.

Position Paper 1 :: essays research papers

Quarter 1 Position paper 1The pile who came to America were only considered losers by the narrow minded thinking of European countries. The hardest time during colonization was when the colonists stuck to the European ideas and were goerned by the mother countries . American society had and continues to have the most conquest by using at that place own ideas and craping an independent society.The so called losers who moved to America were only losers by the narrow minded ideals of the centenarian world countries. The pilgrims had to leave England or face arrest for following there religious beliefs they where considered stunnedcasts in England not because what they were doing was wrong but because it was different. Puritans and Quakers also confront similar persecution for there beliefs. However religious reasons were not the only ones for woful to America some people left because of political unrest, many people left because of the autocratic rule of Charles I. afterward C harles defeat many of his pursuit left to go to the new world. The people who left England and other countries to journey to the new world werent necessarily losers but still out casts of there societies. (An Outline of American History pp.1-2)The unrest and problems created during the colonial menses were a result of the lack of English rateing of the colonies even though there rule prevented the formation of local governments. Although true power over the colonies laid in the hands of the English king and parliament they were to distrait to pay attention to what went on in the colonies leaving power in the hands of local men who were perceived to be powerful because of there social status. When England stepped in and tried to apply strict mercantilism to govern the colonies discontent grew and led to the revolution.(AR pp. 128-184)American prosperity grew from the abandonment of the old ideas and the solution of a new country. The problems escalated until violence broke out o n April 19, 1775. After the Americans won the revolutionary war and severed ties with England the leaders of America began to build a new government.

1920s in The Great Gatsby Essay example -- essays research papers

Written during and regarding the 1920s, The cracking Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald is both a re stick ination of this characteristic social and historical context, and a construction of the composers examine of this era. Beliefs and practises of the interpret also play a crucial role in pliant the text, in particular changing the way in which literary techniques be interpreted. The present-day responder is powerfully influenced by their personal get words, some of which essentially strengthen Fitzgeralds themes, while others compete, establishing contemporary interpretations of the novel. Dubbed the roaring 20s, because of the massive overdress in Americas economy, this social and historical context is wide remembered for its impressive parties and sensationalist attitude. However, Fitzgerald also conveys a more sinister berth to this culture through numerous affairs, poverty and a rampage of coordinate crime. By exposing this moral downfall, Fitzgerald reveals to the res ponder his value of the American dream and his picture of its decline. As a writer, Fitzgerald was always very much concerned with the present times, consequently, his writing style and plot reflects his own experiences of this era. So similar were the lives of Fitzgeralds characters to his own that he once commented, sometimes I dont know whether Zelda (his wife) and I are real or whether we are characters in one of my novels. In 1924, Fitzgerald was affected by Zeldas brief affair with a new French pilot, provoking him to lock her in their house. A construction of this experience can be seen in the way Fitzgerald depicts the 1290s context. For example in The Great Gatsby, there are numerous affairs and at one point, Mr Wilson locks up his wife to pre... ...der an intense image of the pretence that he believed the upper-class mat during the 1920s. In literature, the rose is usually a symbol of beauty and love, until now Fitzgerald makes the comment that in reality, the 1920s a re not entirely the tremendous era they are portrayed to be. While the issue of materialism is silent very relevant in a modern-day context, the force shag it is quite different. Materialism is less a result of societys search for love and happiness in an unethical culture, rather, high proceeds and relatively inexpensive commodities mean that modern, upper-class society obliges to the world of consumerism plainly because it can. Through his remarkable use of techniques and style, Fitzgerald has created a realistic construction of his experience of the 1920s which is also heavily shaped by the present-day responders own beliefs and practices.