Warfare In the Middle East Essay Example for Free

Warf atomic number 18 In the state of strugglemheartedness easternmost EssayThe babies cry. The teens scream. The adults atomic number 18 lead into battle. It is a controersy of what is the scrap in the Middle vitamin E. What is going on with the balance of these two tillages mingled with the Israel judicature and the Arab government? The question is why cant they shit along? The evidence of their resolution to difference is war. The deaths of m any(prenominal) lives due to this contrast of self-command and individualism between these two cultures atomic number 18 leaving families in devastation and creating a genocide effect. One of the engagements is religion.The Middle eastern appointment in war is religion. In history has shown that the conflict has remained against the Israel and Ishmael family. The ideas of conflict between Arab and Israeli culture have been the central point of what is governing the world policy and world governing. It is unfortunat e that the ideologies are establish on whos in chink of estate and how that estate is being govern. The fact of the emergence is that government learn is based on mogul and demand. The demand is the central location of control and convention.The Middle eastern hemisphere culture of Arabs and Israeli compels are based on the ideas of armament and power. First, the conflict has been speculated that the war is based on will power of attain. This ownership is based on identities of the rightful heir of the property. Thus far, the equal conflict of the issue of ownership of property is the fundamental basis of these two cultures conflict in the war and pa subroutine. In many cases, different cultures have conflict using the same ideology. The conflict of ownership of property has been the Western culture conflict as well.The history of conquering and subduing property by force has been a pivotal role in the Western culture. The ideology of Western civilization has been the co ntrol of property. In the same ideas of the Middle East conflict, the role they play is conflict with ownership. Due to the heathen identity, both conflicts are similar in the pursuit to obtain property ownership using force or control. Second, the conflict is the ethnic identity of superiority, or whos in charge? The remaining conflicts are due to the priorities of power and control d adept identity and strength.The two cultures that are in battle are using the tools of force and demand because the ideas of religion and regulation are ownership and control. For example, in the 19th century, the mollification treaty as a resolution was due to the defeat in war non compromise in esteem. These conflicts are not persistent permanently due to the temporary resolutions chosen to settle the disputes of power and ownership. The Arab culture is governed by two principles of religion and politics through faith and practice.On the other hand, the Israeli culture is governed by two princi ples of religion and truth. These two ideas and practices come into conflict because one culture is by force and the other culture is by power. The differences of these two cultures in conflict are the ideas of warfare through the Arabian government forcing their practices and religion on the Israeli culture for government and power. On the other hand, the Israeli culture conflict is the ideas of warfare are through the Israeli God of peace and sustainability of peace through control and demands.The ideas of peace using power are created by the Israeli force of control and demand. The evidence of these two conflicts is seen through the motivations of ethnic identity and military force. On one hand, the effort toward resolution was temporary due to the regulation of faith and worship. In the same practice, the effort of destruction of military power was temporary due to weapons and control. It has been sight the similarities of conflict with Western culture have also been the same as control and demand.The wealth of the land and the wealth of the identity of the culture are used as motivations of power. These similarities with the Middle Eastern conflict are a demonstration that the problem of their conflict is not foreign or unusual, but the conflict is a spreading disease and world personal matters, normal. The government and its leaders perform their duties using force through the motivations of war and conflict. It is an old approach to sustain peace but in observation this is proven to be a false remedy for any peace treaty and resolution for conflict.In the past, the history shows that in the descent of Arab force, the ideas of war and peace have been limited due to the exceeding power, skills and wealth of the Arab culture. The ideas that influence this culture are based upon the belief system of sacrifice and fortune. In any case, the opposite is for the Israeli culture. The Israeli culture has committed to the ideas of peace and truth, the theory of practice and worship of peace within each culture. During the time of war and conflict, the Israeli culture had to depend on peace to create change and order.During the time of peace, the Israeli would use force and demand using laws and regulation against ethnic identity and religion preference. In the Middle East conflict the warfare is originate in through laws and regulation against ethnic identity. It has been observed that the similarities of these practices are unvarying in the world affairs with the Western culture as well. The peace control is used through discovery ethnic identity and freedom of religion. It is a normal practice of creating peace and control.In any case, the continual conflict between these two universal families that have become a foundational spectrum of the world affairs of ethnic and behavior, the war will continue on between these rivals due to the fact of ethnic identity and control of estate. The bottom line to these two ideologies and culture s, the resolution to their conflict is a cross cultural liaison that may delegate a balance and compromise between culture and practice. The overall sense of these two cultures creating peace in their mind is to eliminate one or have the other as dominate over each other.In this current age, the central point to management of cultures and balance begins in creating a compromise of equal opportunity for both ideologies and identities in their own space within one space. It is a saucy practice of negotiation of conflict using management and shared stewardship. It is obvious that this is a practice that is not widely used as of yet, but the ideology of shared stewardship of ownership, property, wealth, identity control through politics and religion is created through balance of control and power. It is unfortunate that the Middle East conflict cannot be resolved due to the resolution of war rather negotiation.It is evidence that too much power given to one culture of any cultures can lead to a conflict of control and power. The sacrifice and worship of any culture that is used against a culture can be devastating to ownership of property and identity of ethnic behavior. The war of the Middle East will not be resolved until the power has shifted to regulate and equally delegate control over each other. In order to see some graphic symbol of balance the ideologies will have to change, shift or become equal in power and control to find balance and resolution.Until then, the conflict will be a competition of ownership and identity. It is in this minute time that the Middle East should set as a priority to sit around a table and discuss control, property and identity of ideology and regulation. Otherwise, the next conflict will be a global conflict control of these two governments, cultures. It is evidence that the Western culture has similarities of the Middle East conflict within their own control of power within the world affairs as well. The Middle East confli ct is not alone in learning how to manage control without using force.For an example, the recent fold destruction of weapons, lead to war without negotiation due to the threat of ownership, power and identity. The Middle East conflict is not an unusual behavior. The world affairs is heading toward a direction of choice in the affairs of management in peace, negotiation and treaties of promise of commitment and faithfulness. Whether ethics are going to become a central matter or faith will continue to be the root of the matter of worship and practice within the actions of power and wealth.This is the conclusion that the Middle East culture of conflict is not stemmed based on religion alone, but based on ownership. The people involved in ownership is threatened by the loss of ownership what can a culture do if they are taught to fight to keep up with power and control? It is a factor of ethnic control using force. thunder mug anyone get to the bottom of conflict and war? The babies cry. The teens scream. The adults are lead into battle. A sad story without a happy ending, conflict is like fire leaving nothing but devastation and loss.